<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Age Discrimination	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.evilhrlady.org/2008/08/age-discrimination.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2008/08/age-discrimination.html</link>
	<description>Everything to make HR better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2932</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2932</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I’m not at all surprised that a company like AARP, would wind up in a situation like this.&lt;br/&gt;There is no difference between them, and any other company regarding HR management. &lt;br/&gt;What I mean is, the mind set is all the same across the board. &lt;br/&gt;There is very little that distinguishes one companies EEO responsibilities, from another&#039;s.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I’m 51 and trying to find a new job, and I have never experienced so much discrimination against me for age in my life.&lt;br/&gt;One or two companies have been quite bold and in my face about it. It shows a complete lack in ability of these companies, to manage people, its assets or it’s self regarding law. You wouldn’t want these companies in your community anyway, much less work for one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not at all surprised that a company like AARP, would wind up in a situation like this.<br />There is no difference between them, and any other company regarding HR management. <br />What I mean is, the mind set is all the same across the board. <br />There is very little that distinguishes one companies EEO responsibilities, from another&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I’m 51 and trying to find a new job, and I have never experienced so much discrimination against me for age in my life.<br />One or two companies have been quite bold and in my face about it. It shows a complete lack in ability of these companies, to manage people, its assets or it’s self regarding law. You wouldn’t want these companies in your community anyway, much less work for one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Huh, anon? Not a single commenter sided with AARP! Most just pointed out that it&#039;s often cheaper to settle  than fight regardless of the merits of the case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, anon? Not a single commenter sided with AARP! Most just pointed out that it&#8217;s often cheaper to settle  than fight regardless of the merits of the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2930</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find it interesting that the HR professionals here are automatically siding with the company without even knowing any details about this case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that the HR professionals here are automatically siding with the company without even knowing any details about this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dataceptionist		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dataceptionist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The overlawyered link is broken :(&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My very small company has just settled with an ex employee who was flat out lying, and they could prove through and through she was flat out lying, but it was miles cheaper to settle, our little company just couldn&#039;t afford her evil evil ways.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The overlawyered link is broken 🙁</p>
<p>My very small company has just settled with an ex employee who was flat out lying, and they could prove through and through she was flat out lying, but it was miles cheaper to settle, our little company just couldn&#8217;t afford her evil evil ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bonnie Lowe		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonnie Lowe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think Jon&#039;s last few words are the key. It&#039;s often cheaper to settle claims (even completely bogus ones) than defend against them. This makes many companies with such &quot;bottom-line&quot; policies tempting targets for professional victims.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jon&#8217;s last few words are the key. It&#8217;s often cheaper to settle claims (even completely bogus ones) than defend against them. This makes many companies with such &#8220;bottom-line&#8221; policies tempting targets for professional victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon Hyman		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Hyman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2008/08/age-discrimination.html#comment-2927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your conclusion hits the nail right on the head. No employment decision is bulletproof. The best a company can hope for is to make decisions based on legitimate business reasons and let the chips fall where they may if the lawsuit comes. At least if there is a legitimate (as opposed to a fabricated or pretextual) business reason to fall back on you have a real chance to come out victorious (although some businesses would wonder how a six-figure legal bill can be construed a victory).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your conclusion hits the nail right on the head. No employment decision is bulletproof. The best a company can hope for is to make decisions based on legitimate business reasons and let the chips fall where they may if the lawsuit comes. At least if there is a legitimate (as opposed to a fabricated or pretextual) business reason to fall back on you have a real chance to come out victorious (although some businesses would wonder how a six-figure legal bill can be construed a victory).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
