<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why You Should Be a Slacker	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.evilhrlady.org/2011/03/why-you-should-be-slacker.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2011/03/why-you-should-be-slacker.html</link>
	<description>Everything to make HR better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Talyssa		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2011/03/why-you-should-be-slacker.html#comment-6569</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Talyssa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2011/03/why-you-should-be-a-slacker.html#comment-6569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find that Type A people are bad at prioritizing.   They make a list of 10 things on a project that need to get done, and then they just kill themselves to get all 10 done rather than identifying that 2 of those things can/should be managed by someone else and that 2 of those things are &#039;nice-to-haves&#039; and can be dropped or pushed back to another day if needed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve worked with a couple of them - they&#039;re basically control freaks.  I worked for one too - she was a good manager actually and I liked her, but she just could NOT hand off a task without also giving you a procedural document/lecture that outlined exactly HOW you should complete a task.   And then she&#039;d get stressed and burned out and everything would fall by the wayside for a week while she had a mini breakdown. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So I think its less that being a slacker is good, and more that being Type A is bad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that Type A people are bad at prioritizing.   They make a list of 10 things on a project that need to get done, and then they just kill themselves to get all 10 done rather than identifying that 2 of those things can/should be managed by someone else and that 2 of those things are &#39;nice-to-haves&#39; and can be dropped or pushed back to another day if needed.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve worked with a couple of them &#8211; they&#39;re basically control freaks.  I worked for one too &#8211; she was a good manager actually and I liked her, but she just could NOT hand off a task without also giving you a procedural document/lecture that outlined exactly HOW you should complete a task.   And then she&#39;d get stressed and burned out and everything would fall by the wayside for a week while she had a mini breakdown. </p>
<p>So I think its less that being a slacker is good, and more that being Type A is bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2011/03/why-you-should-be-slacker.html#comment-6568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/2011/03/why-you-should-be-a-slacker.html#comment-6568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[catchy - yet, misleading title on their part.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It isn&#039;t the &#034;slacker&#034; who does better, it is the one who thinks BEFORE reacting that does better.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That has always made sense. Did they really need to do a study to &#034;discover&#034; that?  Must have gotten a govenment grant and needed something to spend it on ;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And really, it doesn&#039;t surprise me that those who seek out &#034;emotional support&#034; do worse.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certainly, Evil, you and others have seen co-workers who get each other worked up over an issue; worked up by complaining to each other how much a situation or issue sucks.  By the time they get done giving each other &#034;emotional support&#034; they are ready to go running down the office hallways with pitchforks and torches!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>catchy &#8211; yet, misleading title on their part.</p>
<p>It isn&#39;t the &quot;slacker&quot; who does better, it is the one who thinks BEFORE reacting that does better.</p>
<p>That has always made sense. Did they really need to do a study to &quot;discover&quot; that?  Must have gotten a govenment grant and needed something to spend it on 😉</p>
<p>And really, it doesn&#39;t surprise me that those who seek out &quot;emotional support&quot; do worse.  </p>
<p>Certainly, Evil, you and others have seen co-workers who get each other worked up over an issue; worked up by complaining to each other how much a situation or issue sucks.  By the time they get done giving each other &quot;emotional support&quot; they are ready to go running down the office hallways with pitchforks and torches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
