Comments on: How Chipotle’s Plan to Hire 4,000 Workers in One Day Is Sure to Backfire

By: Duncan from Vetter

Duncan from Vetter — Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:07:04 +0000

Publicity is good. Nobody can deny that. However, you cannot turn something so sensitive like hiring into a PR campaign. It is good to point out that your business is doing great, but there are so many other means you can use. This is a risky approach, and as you said, it won’t be as great to hear that “Chipotle fires 3,000 of it’s new hires for incompetence.”

By: Evil HR Lady

Evil HR Lady — Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:33:15 +0000

In reply to Kara. Oh, maybe not, but it's just about publicity and not about hiring the best. It's the wrong approach.

By: Evil HR Lady

Evil HR Lady — Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:32:37 +0000

In reply to charles. They are a little SJWish, but their food is yummy.

By: Kara

Kara — Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:41:58 +0000

Eh, I’m not saying that this is a good idea, but to play devils advocate, Chipotle has over 1,800 stores in the US. What they’re doing that day is allowing each location to hold up to 60 open interviews. If you average the number of locations out to how many they play to hire, you get like 2.25 hires per location. It’s not like they’re planning on hiring 4,000 employees for one location, or even for one area, so saying that 4,000 people in one day is going to create a training problem is somewhat unlikely. Sure, some locations will hire more than the average – and some locations will probably not hire anyone. I doubt the company is forcing stores to make a hire that day, but in an industry that’s known for higher turnover than average (fast food isn’t anyone’s dream job, after all) I’d be willing to bet that most of the locations need another crew member or two anyway. They have, after all, promoted over 10,000 crew members in the last year, so there’s bound to be some vacancies for those entry-level positions. Sure, it’s a publicity stunt, but it really isn’t any different than retail locations hiring on-the-spot from a job fair or a grocery store spending one day a month holding open interviews. No one ever said that was the best way to hire – goodness knows, I’m against it, and I advise my clients not to hire that way – but for a crew member on a restaurant assembly line, I bet that they won’t fire any more of these new hires than they normally do.

By: charles

charles — Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:00:20 +0000

Truth be told I have never eaten at Chipotle, nor do I have any desire to. There ad campaigns come across as too much of a “Social Justice Warrior” mentality. e.g., “Hope that, in the future everyone eats free, no one must work, all just sit around feeling love for each other.” Yuck! That doesn’t exactly make me want to chow down on their food.

So, how about a couple of savvy journalists do a “where are they now” segment on the evening news 6 months later.

But, they would have to be honest and look at both the successes and the failures. It would be interesting.

By: Evil HR Lady

Evil HR Lady — Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:01:39 +0000

In reply to Horse Tense. I don't like the pressure on each branch to hire ON THAT DAY whether they need to or not.

By: Horse Tense

Horse Tense — Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:41:04 +0000

I used to LOVE Chipotle, but I haven’t to one since moving 7 years ago. I was looking forward to going the next time I visited family, but now that I have learned of these plans I am thinking it may be in my best interest to skip it.

You were right on when you said: “It’s better to hire right the first time than to have to fire people.” The truth of this in particular frightens me.

Once Chipotle goes through with this idea, firing the people that need to be fired will be admitting defeat, and after making this kind of commitment I doubt they will want to do that.

I truly hope they read your article and have the wherewithal to ammend their plans.