<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: McDonald&#8217;s Faces 23 New Sexual Harassment Complaints	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.evilhrlady.org/2019/05/mcdonalds-faces-23-new-sexual-harassment-complaints.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2019/05/mcdonalds-faces-23-new-sexual-harassment-complaints.html</link>
	<description>Everything to make HR better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 12:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2019/05/mcdonalds-faces-23-new-sexual-harassment-complaints.html#comment-213970</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 12:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=5320#comment-213970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.evilhrlady.org/2019/05/mcdonalds-faces-23-new-sexual-harassment-complaints.html#comment-213955&quot;&gt;grannybunny&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m pretty sure this is the wrong way to go, for a few reasons. 

First, there&#039;s the squick factor of having my boss dictate who I can have a relationship with. I know the lines between &quot;personal&quot; and &quot;professional&quot; life aren&#039;t as hard as some of us would like, but that&#039;s a bit too far. I know I&#039;m in the minority here. 

More significantly: A LOT of these employees are going to be teens or in their early 20s. Even managers. Many shift managers come up from the ranks, and many are high school/college students. Dictating who they can date is going to be an exercise in futility. The logistics are going to be a nightmare as well. If someone&#039;s a good employee, and worthy of moving up, but happens to be dating a fellow employee on the same level, do I refuse to give her the promotion? Do I promote her but tell her she must break up with her partner (and risk the impending lawsuit)? Or do you explain to her &quot;You&#039;re moving up in the world, and that means new responsibilities. I need to know you can handle it&quot;? 

I&#039;m all for coming down hard on those who commit sexual harassment. I don&#039;t think that punishing everyone (and that&#039;s how this is going to be viewed by the majority of the--again teenage or early 20s--staff) is the way to go.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.evilhrlady.org/2019/05/mcdonalds-faces-23-new-sexual-harassment-complaints.html#comment-213955">grannybunny</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure this is the wrong way to go, for a few reasons. </p>
<p>First, there&#8217;s the squick factor of having my boss dictate who I can have a relationship with. I know the lines between &#8220;personal&#8221; and &#8220;professional&#8221; life aren&#8217;t as hard as some of us would like, but that&#8217;s a bit too far. I know I&#8217;m in the minority here. </p>
<p>More significantly: A LOT of these employees are going to be teens or in their early 20s. Even managers. Many shift managers come up from the ranks, and many are high school/college students. Dictating who they can date is going to be an exercise in futility. The logistics are going to be a nightmare as well. If someone&#8217;s a good employee, and worthy of moving up, but happens to be dating a fellow employee on the same level, do I refuse to give her the promotion? Do I promote her but tell her she must break up with her partner (and risk the impending lawsuit)? Or do you explain to her &#8220;You&#8217;re moving up in the world, and that means new responsibilities. I need to know you can handle it&#8221;? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for coming down hard on those who commit sexual harassment. I don&#8217;t think that punishing everyone (and that&#8217;s how this is going to be viewed by the majority of the&#8211;again teenage or early 20s&#8211;staff) is the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MariaRose		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2019/05/mcdonalds-faces-23-new-sexual-harassment-complaints.html#comment-213957</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MariaRose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 22:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=5320#comment-213957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since the majority of McDonald&#039;s are a franchise location, the corporate McDonald&#039;s needs to come down hard on these owners to eliminate this problem. For it to have come up as a New York Times article, means that this has been kept under wraps by the franchise owners until someone connected the dots and sued the corporation to get results. I am quite sure this is discussed quite rigorously at Hamburger University at corporate headquarters.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the majority of McDonald&#8217;s are a franchise location, the corporate McDonald&#8217;s needs to come down hard on these owners to eliminate this problem. For it to have come up as a New York Times article, means that this has been kept under wraps by the franchise owners until someone connected the dots and sued the corporation to get results. I am quite sure this is discussed quite rigorously at Hamburger University at corporate headquarters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: grannybunny		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2019/05/mcdonalds-faces-23-new-sexual-harassment-complaints.html#comment-213955</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grannybunny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=5320#comment-213955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These 23 cases are just the tip of the iceberg.  McDonald&#039;s needs to implement an absolute anti-fraternization policy, prohibiting managers -- including those at franchise locations -- from sexual relationships with their employees, upon pain of termination of their jobs or franchises.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These 23 cases are just the tip of the iceberg.  McDonald&#8217;s needs to implement an absolute anti-fraternization policy, prohibiting managers &#8212; including those at franchise locations &#8212; from sexual relationships with their employees, upon pain of termination of their jobs or franchises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
