Defensive much?

Kindly read my recent comment. With all due respect you aren’t reading this document correctly at all. Please try again.

I think you need brush up on your reading comprehension and also spit up some propaganda Kool Aid. We are in an Emergency Use (EUA), the whole concept of which is to take measured risk with an incomplete vaccine. It really doesn’t matter that they have been working on this for “ten whole years” which is actually a very short time for medicine, that doesn’t change the EUA status. Also, I provided a link with the most simple, straight forward and clear documentation on the CDC site and directly from a vaccine manufacturer and you even misunderstood the clinical trial dates written in the most plain and simple English for you. This seems like some deep cognitive dissonance at work here.

Did you read the material at your link? The ongoing clinical trial appears to be for children age 12 – 16.

Well, actually, these vaccines weren’t really “made in 6 months.” They all built on processes that had been developed over prior years.

JB, you are incorrect. The Phase 3 trials are done.

Any and all medications can cause side effects, and even serious and significant ones. That doesn’t make them broadly unsafe.

As far as the ongoing trials? Sure. For one thing, there are still trials going on in younger people (children and infants.) Also, trials to test for immunity against new variants. etc. But that does not mean that the current vaccine roll out is a phase 3 trial. The claim itself show how profoundly misinformed you are. Because this is not how phase 3 trials are run.

I am back with the link. Scroll to the bottom and there is at the end of the document the Phase 3 clinical trial date in 2023. Really just think it through. No medicine or vaccine can be made in 6 months. That’s fantasy.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728

Unfortunately, you are misinformed as are most people which is what is very concerning to me. Right now is the Phase 3 trial. If the trials were completed we would already have FDA approval and the EUA wouldn’t be necessary. Anyone that participated in the vaccine is part of a medical experiment, which is fine if that’s their choice, but everyone should be more aware of this instead of thinking the opposite. If you read the Fact Sheets on the CDC site https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download you will see they say “Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.”. Sounds different than all the news pushing that vaccines are entirely safe and effective right? I’m too tired to look, but another part of that section provides the end date of the trials and that is in 2023. So essentially employer are forcing employees to be lab animals, due to a cleverly crafted law that creates a conundrum. What is an interesting story to follow, however, is the lawsuit the Indian bar has just filed against the WHO. I don’t even want to link it here because it’s a taboo topic, but you can just Google what I described and will easily find it. So the question is if they are right and there is another drug available that works at a higher efficacy than vaccines, why risk taking an unapproved vaccine? And if there is a viable option to the vaccine than the EUA can’t exist. Should be a very interesting story to follow and see how it all unfolds. If I had a choice between these two preventions I would go with the non-vaccine one due to 40+ years of medical studies on it.

No, that’s literally not the case here – there are massive amounts of data available. EUAs only exist during the course of a public health emergency, which isn’t just about approving a biologic on an adjusted schedule, but permitting to to be distributed for only as long as the public emergency is in effect. You not participating in a Phase 3 study doesn’t impact your employer, and it’s not a good analogy here either- The vaccinations approved have already gone through phase 3 trials, which have included tens of thousands of people tracked over 2 months, which is more than reasonable for a vaccine.

The testing is done. Other people have done the dangerous part. And natural Covid antibodies only last a few months, so you’re not as protected as you think you are. Obviously it’s your call what treatments you take, but you’re incorrect about the data and about the law. The law is being followed 100%. I just don’t want to get sick because you’re ignorant of it.