<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Court Says United Airline&#8217;s Unpaid Leave Policy for Religious Objectors Does &#8216;Irreparable Harm&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.evilhrlady.org/2022/02/a-court-says-united-airlines-unpaid-leave-policy-for-religious-objectors-does-irreparable-harm.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2022/02/a-court-says-united-airlines-unpaid-leave-policy-for-religious-objectors-does-irreparable-harm.html</link>
	<description>Everything to make HR better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: grannybunny		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2022/02/a-court-says-united-airlines-unpaid-leave-policy-for-religious-objectors-does-irreparable-harm.html#comment-233079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grannybunny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=6560#comment-233079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree that the decision can be -- largely -- ignored.  It&#039;s just the Fifth Circuit muddling up an issue, as usual.  The whole dispute is almost &quot;much ado about nothing,&quot; since there will be very few employees qualifying for a religious exemption anyway, and the legal test as to whether or not a religious accommodation is reasonable is that it doesn&#039;t create more than a de minimus hardship, an extremely low bar indeed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the decision can be &#8212; largely &#8212; ignored.  It&#8217;s just the Fifth Circuit muddling up an issue, as usual.  The whole dispute is almost &#8220;much ado about nothing,&#8221; since there will be very few employees qualifying for a religious exemption anyway, and the legal test as to whether or not a religious accommodation is reasonable is that it doesn&#8217;t create more than a de minimus hardship, an extremely low bar indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
