<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Candidate Said ‘Water’ in an Interview. What Happened Next Reveals a Hiring Problem	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.evilhrlady.org/2025/12/a-candidate-said-water-in-an-interview-what-happened-next-reveals-a-hiring-problem.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2025/12/a-candidate-said-water-in-an-interview-what-happened-next-reveals-a-hiring-problem.html</link>
	<description>Everything to make HR better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2025 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Suraj Junghare		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2025/12/a-candidate-said-water-in-an-interview-what-happened-next-reveals-a-hiring-problem.html#comment-243341</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suraj Junghare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2025 13:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8021#comment-243341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This hiring manager seemed as though he wasn&#039;t necessarily looking for a quality hire, rather a quality performance. The candidate&#039;s most direct and simplistic response of &quot;Water&quot; was indeed an honest and professional answer, yet it cost him heavily because he did not play the manager&#039;s odd game of unstandardized behavior.

The issue is that the hiring manager did not care about the content of what the candidate said; he was looking to hear a response he expected to receive regarding the candidate&#039;s personality traits.

The hiring manager ended the interview for a variety of reasons, which could include his ego, bias (conscious or unconscious), or an ill-conceived interview structure. The candidate avoided a serious pitfall by providing the simplest answer to a preference question, which gives some indication of the way the hiring manager would likely respond to more complex issues in the workplace.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This hiring manager seemed as though he wasn&#8217;t necessarily looking for a quality hire, rather a quality performance. The candidate&#8217;s most direct and simplistic response of &#8220;Water&#8221; was indeed an honest and professional answer, yet it cost him heavily because he did not play the manager&#8217;s odd game of unstandardized behavior.</p>
<p>The issue is that the hiring manager did not care about the content of what the candidate said; he was looking to hear a response he expected to receive regarding the candidate&#8217;s personality traits.</p>
<p>The hiring manager ended the interview for a variety of reasons, which could include his ego, bias (conscious or unconscious), or an ill-conceived interview structure. The candidate avoided a serious pitfall by providing the simplest answer to a preference question, which gives some indication of the way the hiring manager would likely respond to more complex issues in the workplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
