<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Improve Your HR	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.evilhrlady.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/</link>
	<description>Everything to make HR better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:48:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Chick-fil-A Franchise Sued by the EEOC Over a Religious Accommodation. Here Are 5 Lessons for Employers by Dinwar		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/06/chick-fil-a-franchise-sued-by-the-eeoc-over-a-religious-accommodation-here-are-5-lessons-for-employers.html#comment-245702</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinwar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8208#comment-245702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/06/chick-fil-a-franchise-sued-by-the-eeoc-over-a-religious-accommodation-here-are-5-lessons-for-employers.html#comment-245662&quot;&gt;MariaRose&lt;/a&gt;.

On the flip side, this is a company that is fairly open about pushing certain religious views, including funding political campaigns to criminalize lifestyles they disagree with. The company also came under fire due to their attempts to have volunteers work for them, and to &quot;pay&quot; the volunteers in coupons for their food--fairly obvious and direct violations of employment laws. There have been other scandals before as well. 

This is not making a mountain out of a molehill. This is a company with flagrant disregard for employment laws. If you constantly misbehave and flaunt the rules and regulations, you cannot be surprised when people react harshly to borderline cases. They have used up their goodwill and it&#039;s absolutely justified for courts to view their actions in the harshest light. 

It&#039;s like Capone. Sure, tax evasion was almost certainly the least of his crimes, almost laughably irrelevant to the career of a violent gangster. But it was an opening, and the authorities quite properly took that opening. 

I would also wonder whether &quot;If you don&#039;t violate your religious views you can&#039;t move up the ladder&quot; is legal. It&#039;d be one thing if it was directly related to the job--someone with a religious taboo against blood transfusions won&#039;t get far with organizations that do blood donations, for example--but this is fast food. I&#039;m sorry, but if you&#039;re a manager and can&#039;t handle &quot;I can&#039;t work Saturdays&quot; you&#039;re incompetent, pure and simple. This is a perfectly normal sort of boundary for people in this line of work to have. If this was for child care, caring for a relative, going to school, etc., we wouldn&#039;t even be having this conversation (or we&#039;d be talking about how stupid the manager is). The only reason this is an issue is religion, and that makes it legally problematic. Enough to make it illegal? Eh, depends on where you are and what judge you get; there&#039;s a broad gray area in the law. Enough that it should make any competent regional manager or executive question the manager&#039;s competence? Absolutely. I&#039;d be VERY curious what other policies and procedures this manager is ignoring.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/06/chick-fil-a-franchise-sued-by-the-eeoc-over-a-religious-accommodation-here-are-5-lessons-for-employers.html#comment-245662">MariaRose</a>.</p>
<p>On the flip side, this is a company that is fairly open about pushing certain religious views, including funding political campaigns to criminalize lifestyles they disagree with. The company also came under fire due to their attempts to have volunteers work for them, and to &#8220;pay&#8221; the volunteers in coupons for their food&#8211;fairly obvious and direct violations of employment laws. There have been other scandals before as well. </p>
<p>This is not making a mountain out of a molehill. This is a company with flagrant disregard for employment laws. If you constantly misbehave and flaunt the rules and regulations, you cannot be surprised when people react harshly to borderline cases. They have used up their goodwill and it&#8217;s absolutely justified for courts to view their actions in the harshest light. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like Capone. Sure, tax evasion was almost certainly the least of his crimes, almost laughably irrelevant to the career of a violent gangster. But it was an opening, and the authorities quite properly took that opening. </p>
<p>I would also wonder whether &#8220;If you don&#8217;t violate your religious views you can&#8217;t move up the ladder&#8221; is legal. It&#8217;d be one thing if it was directly related to the job&#8211;someone with a religious taboo against blood transfusions won&#8217;t get far with organizations that do blood donations, for example&#8211;but this is fast food. I&#8217;m sorry, but if you&#8217;re a manager and can&#8217;t handle &#8220;I can&#8217;t work Saturdays&#8221; you&#8217;re incompetent, pure and simple. This is a perfectly normal sort of boundary for people in this line of work to have. If this was for child care, caring for a relative, going to school, etc., we wouldn&#8217;t even be having this conversation (or we&#8217;d be talking about how stupid the manager is). The only reason this is an issue is religion, and that makes it legally problematic. Enough to make it illegal? Eh, depends on where you are and what judge you get; there&#8217;s a broad gray area in the law. Enough that it should make any competent regional manager or executive question the manager&#8217;s competence? Absolutely. I&#8217;d be VERY curious what other policies and procedures this manager is ignoring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Chick-fil-A Franchise Sued by the EEOC Over a Religious Accommodation. Here Are 5 Lessons for Employers by MariaRose		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/06/chick-fil-a-franchise-sued-by-the-eeoc-over-a-religious-accommodation-here-are-5-lessons-for-employers.html#comment-245662</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MariaRose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 21:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8208#comment-245662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If that employee was looking fro a full time position at Chick-Fil-A, knowing that they already had Sunday off, and was using the religious need excuse for getting out of working Saturdays--in other words was stating quite clearly that their availability was only Monday through Friday, I would consider hiring but make sure that the employee knew that not being available for the busiest day if the work week might limit their potential to move up the line for promotion and also limit what available hours they could be scheduled to work, especially if they also limited their availability to leaving early. That&#039;s not discrimination, that&#039;s merely giving the employee a heads up about why they don&#039;t get as many hours as expected with a limitation in availability. Seeing the employer for otherwise is just creating something out of nothing and should not fall under the EEOC regulations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that employee was looking fro a full time position at Chick-Fil-A, knowing that they already had Sunday off, and was using the religious need excuse for getting out of working Saturdays&#8211;in other words was stating quite clearly that their availability was only Monday through Friday, I would consider hiring but make sure that the employee knew that not being available for the busiest day if the work week might limit their potential to move up the line for promotion and also limit what available hours they could be scheduled to work, especially if they also limited their availability to leaving early. That&#8217;s not discrimination, that&#8217;s merely giving the employee a heads up about why they don&#8217;t get as many hours as expected with a limitation in availability. Seeing the employer for otherwise is just creating something out of nothing and should not fall under the EEOC regulations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Your HR Person Isn’t Slowing You Down. They’re Telling You the Truth Nobody Else Will by Anthony		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/05/your-hr-person-isnt-slowing-you-down-theyre-telling-you-the-truth-nobody-else-will.html#comment-245596</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 11:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8203#comment-245596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At it&#039;s essence yes, HR is often the ones who have to say the uncomfortable truths and this is coming from personal experience. It&#039;s also why partners like Hire With Near stand out, who seem more focused on honest communication with actual intent instead of just rushing hiring processes. Good read overall!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At it&#8217;s essence yes, HR is often the ones who have to say the uncomfortable truths and this is coming from personal experience. It&#8217;s also why partners like Hire With Near stand out, who seem more focused on honest communication with actual intent instead of just rushing hiring processes. Good read overall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Beware of losing the rule you hate by MariaRose		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/05/beware-of-losing-the-rule-you-hate.html#comment-245575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MariaRose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 20:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8199#comment-245575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We have too many people who don&#039;t understand or want to understand the need of rules, especially when they have the attitude that rules don&#039;t apply to them ( an implied privilege) or they get a self-gratification in pushing the limits and don&#039;t care how their actions not following the rules creates consequences on others and themselves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have too many people who don&#8217;t understand or want to understand the need of rules, especially when they have the attitude that rules don&#8217;t apply to them ( an implied privilege) or they get a self-gratification in pushing the limits and don&#8217;t care how their actions not following the rules creates consequences on others and themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Beware of losing the rule you hate by Braver		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/05/beware-of-losing-the-rule-you-hate.html#comment-245574</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Braver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 20:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8199#comment-245574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On behalf of overly stuffed bureaucrats everywhere, thank you for this article. You’ve put into words what I’ve struggled for a long time to express.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On behalf of overly stuffed bureaucrats everywhere, thank you for this article. You’ve put into words what I’ve struggled for a long time to express.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Get Things Done with Claude for HR by Beth		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/05/8197.html#comment-245546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8197#comment-245546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to be traveling with this happens - will there be a recording I can access later if I register? Or will you be offering it again in the near future?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be traveling with this happens &#8211; will there be a recording I can access later if I register? Or will you be offering it again in the near future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why 80 Percent of Workers Claim They Were ‘Catfished’ (and How it Costs You $50,000) by Eric		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/05/why-80-percent-of-workers-claim-they-were-catfished-and-how-it-costs-you-50000.html#comment-245530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8194#comment-245530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Early in my career when I was making my first big move, I was catfished and offered a lower title than what I came in to interview for.  I actually had two offers at that point so of course I took the other one.  I have never regretted it, and I look back at that experience as one of my least positive interview experiences.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early in my career when I was making my first big move, I was catfished and offered a lower title than what I came in to interview for.  I actually had two offers at that point so of course I took the other one.  I have never regretted it, and I look back at that experience as one of my least positive interview experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Say what you mean by Horse Tense		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/04/say-what-you-mean.html#comment-245197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horse Tense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8176#comment-245197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://youtu.be/UO-qjKEcLZg

For you Evil Hr Lady, I am not sure if the stylings of The Lunachicks ever made it onto a mix - tape or playlist for you... so I would be remiss if I did not share my favorite (and on theme) song of theirs now.  Keep it Real!  Keep HR Punk.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://youtu.be/UO-qjKEcLZg" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/UO-qjKEcLZg</a></p>
<p>For you Evil Hr Lady, I am not sure if the stylings of The Lunachicks ever made it onto a mix &#8211; tape or playlist for you&#8230; so I would be remiss if I did not share my favorite (and on theme) song of theirs now.  Keep it Real!  Keep HR Punk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why This Startup CEO is Using Rage-Bait to Grow His Business by Mike T		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/04/why-this-startup-ceo-is-using-rage-bait-to-grow-his-business.html#comment-245189</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 18:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8179#comment-245189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your reaction to this is rage baiting me. “You’re teaching folks they don’t have to do what their bosses say.”  Newsflash. They don’t. It’s high time than these so called leaders realize they are not gods. 

If a company fires someone for something like this (CEO should be fired ) as opposed to what they can do in their actual work then that company deserves whatever ill it gets. 

And yes. I’ve been in HR for over 15 years. Most of that as a manager and prior to that I was an engineering manager for another 10 years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your reaction to this is rage baiting me. “You’re teaching folks they don’t have to do what their bosses say.”  Newsflash. They don’t. It’s high time than these so called leaders realize they are not gods. </p>
<p>If a company fires someone for something like this (CEO should be fired ) as opposed to what they can do in their actual work then that company deserves whatever ill it gets. </p>
<p>And yes. I’ve been in HR for over 15 years. Most of that as a manager and prior to that I was an engineering manager for another 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Say what you mean by MariaRose		</title>
		<link>https://www.evilhrlady.org/2026/04/say-what-you-mean.html#comment-245154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MariaRose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.evilhrlady.org/?p=8176#comment-245154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article emphasizes that you cannot imply by inference assumption that certain information is known as common knowledge--like the example given of what is business attire--which we know is very subject to a great deal of interpretation in today&#039;s world of allowance of differences--but there always can be a guideline standard to have as a basis and that always should be in writing, so the company covers the fine line interpretation differences. Verbal discourse will not cover it, especially if the individuals claim the eventual &quot;I don&#039;t remember excuse&quot;--having in in written form clarifies and eliminates the &quot;confusion&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article emphasizes that you cannot imply by inference assumption that certain information is known as common knowledge&#8211;like the example given of what is business attire&#8211;which we know is very subject to a great deal of interpretation in today&#8217;s world of allowance of differences&#8211;but there always can be a guideline standard to have as a basis and that always should be in writing, so the company covers the fine line interpretation differences. Verbal discourse will not cover it, especially if the individuals claim the eventual &#8220;I don&#8217;t remember excuse&#8221;&#8211;having in in written form clarifies and eliminates the &#8220;confusion&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
