There is a panic spreading across social media about the reclassification of many graduate degrees as non-professional, and how that could affect pay scales, as well as the amount people can borrow to pay for those degrees). If you’re an employer, the two questions you actually need answered are: “Do I have to reclassify anyone?” (no), and ‘Will this make it harder or more expensive to hire in certain professions?” Probably.
What the proposed change in ‘professional degree status’ means
The proposed changes to the U.S. Department of Education’s regulation on how graduate degrees are classified can be found here, if you’re inclined to read them. The thing people are concerned about is the split between “professional” degrees and regular “graduate” degrees. The One Big Beautiful Bill capped federal unsubsidized loans for both groups, but at different levels. These are the proposed regulatory rulings on how these changes will be implemented. The jobs themselves are not reclassified, as the DEO is using an old definition. The change is in the amount you can borrow.
In a press release, the Department of Education explained:
To keep reading, click here: What the Department of Education’s ‘Professional Degree’ Proposal Really Means for Employers

People get why there is worry about this stuff. Online discussions make it seem like whole professions are getting downgraded in some way. But that is not really going on at all. No jobs are facing reclassification right now. Employers also do not have to reclassify workers within their own systems.
The true shift comes in how some graduate degrees get labeled for federal loan programs. That labeling directly influences the borrowing limits available to students. In the end, the biggest effects should appear through higher education expenses. They will also show up in the ways that future job seekers handle funding their own degrees. Employers face just one real issue here. It involves whether these changes might turn certain fields into tougher or pricier spots for recruitment efforts. And that outcome does seem possible in some cases. Still, nothing about this touches job titles or pay structures. It leaves employer-side classifications untouched as well.